Athens 12-08-08, Petros Giannakouris AP

If a statement of the goal to become a factor in stabilizing the planet is to be anything but mouthwash, the hard core reasons for the Greek outburst must get microscopic examination.  References accompanying these photos have good raw material, and Boutros Boutros-Ghali sets a superb example of foundation reasoning useful in dealing with a class of violence.  For those who would make a difference, there is no shortage of opportunity.  More recent fallout from the subprime market failure exponentially increased the value of the kind of entrepreneurial talent needed here.  A major problem in approaching this question is noise marginally related to the basic issues.  The next Triad effort to cut through this is an initial attempt to scope a focused Web 4.0.

William Blake, Jacobs Ladder

This all goes to Triad Phase II, with a concept draft in legal review. As discussed in Development, the draft will say that an organization larger than earth is capable of engaging and that this engagement shows promise of an alternative to the Janszen prognosis for recovery from this bubble. On a more abstract level, the Triad will take the position that Baudrillard, if alive, would enjoy his vindication. Approach concept may become a little more clear if an analogy is drawn between Jacobs Ladder and Formula I racing. The team likely to make the most valuable contribution to easing tensions arising from religious extremism will be the one able to master theory in the wind tunnel, execute on race day and transpose the process to the hard kernels existing in that class of conflict.

In a sense, the small tribe at J.P. Morgan who conceived, refined and developed the derivatives market had an impact on the planet far more significant than has the original al-Qaeda.  Even so, the Triad looks for abstract equivalencies and experiments appropriate to applying them to respective damage controls. Suppose, for the sake of argument, one takes the position that the pure J.P. Morgan intent was to conform credit risk to the capabilities of data management and computation – no comment on the validity of the correlation and default probability algorithm – with commensurate compensation.  Now consider al-Qaeda in the light of Dr. Philpott‘s analysis.  Is there an unbridgeable conceptual difference?  I think not.  These events were simultaneously  catalysts and consequences, with downstream consequences largely shaped by special interests and reactions to them.  Can it be said that neither of these chains of events morphed into something diluted by purposes other than the original intent?  Again, I think not.

This morning BBC aired a story about a Christian missionary who carried Bibles in Arabic into the Muslim world.  Woven into the interview was the point that one Muslim objected to considering Jesus the Godhead and that pursuing this line of reasoning was cause for execution.  Is it not reasonable to assume that this is a hard kernel, characteristic of hundreds of others, which must and can eventually be resolved?  Core concepts for this process will continue to be refined in Theology. More detail will become available as Phases II and III progress.